Sunday, February 22, 2009
WWIII?
Also, now, unlike 50 years ago, people keep traveling and moving to different countries. Before, there weren't many nationalities in one country and if there were, they all wanted freedom. Now it's different because if people move to a country other than their own country, it is because they want to. People from all different parts of the world are friends now. There isn't a high chance that many countries will go to war on a large scale. Before, countries all wanted power, colonies, fame, etc. but now they get money and power by building their economy, and not trying to take over other countries. We don't have people like Hitler who want to take over the world. Lastly, if some countries were having a problem, they wouldn't go to war to fix it because now we have technology much better than the technology we had before and communication is much better. This is why I don't believe there will be a WWIII in our lifetime.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Anne Frank Roundtables
I agree with Anne Frank and I think that the common man is also guilty for the actions taken during WWII. Politicians did play a much bigger role, Hitler was by far the worst, and it was his fault, but I think that if the common man hadn't allowed it, Hitler wouldn't have gotten so much power. People might have been influenced to help the Nazis because they were scared of Hitler, and scared of dying. Many of them were also desperate and wanted their economy to be boosted and be able to live a better life. They also wanted money and a job, so they joined the Nazi party. At the beginning, I don't think they really knew what was happening too much. As the war started going on, they must have known what was happening though. If they quit their jobs, it wouldn't have allowed Hitler to kill so many people. The people who mainly joined the resistance were probably Jews, and other people Hitler was seeking to kill. They were people who didn't fear their lives as much as the people who joined Hitler. They knew he was wrong in what he did and that is why they stood their ground and did not join him.
This is why I think Anne Frank was right in what she said.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
World War II: A Letter from the Battlefront
Dear Mom,
Today, I am sitting in one of the multiple recovery rooms of St. Peter's Hospital. I am slowly recovering from the several injuries I received during the German invasion of Poland which I was a part of. We, the Germans, won the battle, but as a person, I can't say I won. Bombs were dropped on helpless towns killing the screaming women and children in seconds. Tanks were coming in from every side of Poland leaving no one to know what was coming next. The Polish were greatly outnumbered with their 180 tanks, and 240 aircraft compared to our 2,600 tanks and 2,000 aircraft. They were not prepared for an attack like this and had no chance to win against our 1.8 million troops. I had been excited for war, but now I can hardly live knowing that I have killed so many innocent people for the good of Hitler. I try to assure myself that its the good of Germany and the rest of the Germans, but how can anyone obtain good from murdering and slaughtering people like you would chickens?
We invaded Poland from 3 fronts. East Prussia from the north, Germany from the west, and Slovakia from the south, forcing the Poles to retreat to the east. About two weeks after we started the invasion, on September 14, Warsaw was completely surrounded by our troops. This is when, on September 17, the Soviet Union attacked from the east leaving Poland completely surrounded by enemy forces. (Just a week before the attack, we signed the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, a treaty of non-aggression between us and the Soviets which allowed us to attack Poland.) In order to get the rest of Poland under our control, we started using our "Blitzkrieg" tactics and also bombed many villages and towns which left the air black with smoke and the ground orange with fire.
By early October, Poland had surrendered to the German forces, but not without doing enough damage to us. They lasted twice as long as we had suspected killing about 50,000 men, and destroying 697 planes and 993 tanks. This wasn't the only damage the attack of Poland cost us though, on September 3, just 2 days after our attack, Britain declared war on us followed by France, and many other countries. Here I am at the hospital, getting better from these injuries while I think of all the people we killed, people who can never get better. People just like us, who won't get to live the rest of their life, and the people who are getting into war as I write, many who will die as young men. It is a requirement that I go into war again when I recover, but I hope to be home soon, and I hope this war ends soon before too many more lives are taken.
http://pro.corbis.com/images/NA002785.jpg?size=67&uid=%
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Recipe Poem for World War II
-1 cup of a failure of the Treaty of Versailles
-2 cups of the failure of the League of Nations
-5 cups of fascism
-1 pint of Hitler
-1 teaspoon of Mussolini
-1 table spoon of Stalin
-5/8 cups of aggression from Japan
-3 cups of aggression from Germany
-4 teaspoons of appeasement
- 1 cup of an invasion of Poland and Czechoslovakia
-1/2 cup of anger
Directions:
In a large bowl of hatred, mix the 1 cup of a failure of the Treaty of Versailles with 2 cups of the failure of the League of Nations until smooth.
Blend in 3 cups of aggression from Germany with 5/8 cups of aggression from Japan.
Combine with 5 cups of fascism, 1 pint of Hitler, 1 tablespoon of Stalin, and 1 teaspoon of Mussolini. Stir the mixture with spoonfuls of power.
In a separate bow of regret, for the icing, mix together 1 cup of an invasion of Poland and Czechoslovakia with 1/2 cup of anger.
Bake for 10 minutes while the mixture slowly starts changing. When it's ready, add the icing which will be just enough to complete this blend of emotions.
Now you'll have a well done World War II.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Animal Farm Critique
I liked the novel and the movie, but I think the book was better. It's hard to pick one, because they were both good, but I did think the book was better. First, although the movie might have been visual, the book described everything much better. Secondly, the animals actually talked in the book which made it easier to understand while the movie was rather vague because no one said anything. It was kind of annoying when the narrator kept coming in, too. Lastly, the characters were better shown and described in the book than in the movie. Also, there would be no movie without George Orwell's book, so I think the book was better.
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Which Animal Are You?

The character that I am most like in this book is Clover. This is because she is like me in many ways. First of all, she is a very supportive friend. When Boxer was sick at the end, she stayed by him the whole time. She not only loyal to her friends, but to all the animals on the farm too. She's a hard worker and she doesn't let them down. Also, she knows somethings wrong when Napoleon takes over, and she knows that things aren't going right, but she doesn't really know what to do about it. She has difficulty speaking out for herself sometimes, although she knows somethings wrong for fear of the pigs and dogs. I am similar in a way because sometimes I know what to do, but I won't always speak out about it. She doesn't give up because she knows that everyone has to work in order for the farm to run correctly. When anyone's sick, she stays to help them and she also comforts the younger animals from the dogs. I share these characteristics with her too, and this is why I think I'm most like Clover.
